![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in EE
b. 58-59
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
It is unclear whether Chopin wanted to mark the staccato of the quaver after the semiquaver triplet with a dot, as it is in A, or with a wedge, as it is in AI (only in bar 58) and FE (→GE,EE; in EE2 both signs were omitted, while in GE3 in bar 58 there is a dot). In this case, we consider A as the most reliable source. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE |
||||||||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The pair of dynamic hairpins was overlooked in EE2. category imprint: issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||||||||
b. 67-68
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Both the placement of the sign in bar 67 and the shape of the accents in both bars are, according to us, a result of a less careful notation of the final part of the Etude by Chopin. Therefore, in the main text we suggest long accents modelled on the notation of A in bars 14-15. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in EE |
||||||||||||||
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Two category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The type of the accents written by Chopin in A is not clear in these bars. According to us, the use of long accents is more likely in this context. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in EE |