data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Both autographs lack some of the necessary naturals in this bar, although these which are included allow for a clear interpretation of the text:
-
in AI there is no sign before c2 in the 3rd chord in the R.H., while the
before c is unnecessarily repeated on the 6th semiquaver in the bar (due to the brief notation of the octave, the sign concerns also the bottom C);
-
in A there is no
before the bottom C at the 2nd semiquaver, while the only sign in the part of the R.H. is a
before c2 in the last chord.
The necessary signs were added in FE (→GE,EE), while in GE4 (→GE5), the unnecessary at the end of the bar was removed.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Accidentals in different octaves, GE revisions, Omission of current key accidentals, Authentic corrections of FE, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Pitch