data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In GE5 the last note is an erroneous quaver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The long accent in A (→FE→EE2→EE3) was reproduced in GE1 (→GE1a) as category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Looking at bar 29, one could wonder whether the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Sign reversal |
||||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
There is no staccato dot over the 4th semiquaver in A. It is such an evident oversight that its presence in FE (→GE,EE) may be even a result of the engraver's inaccuracy. However, a conscious action of the engraver or Chopin's proofreading also cannot be excluded. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give most probably the only (except for AI, which is devoid of indications) authentic version of articulation signs – four staccato dots written in A, traditionally meaning small accents. The remaining versions are probably a result of imposition of errors and revisions of the editors. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |