



Rhythm
b. 2-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Chopin changed the version of the last semiquaver in bars 2 and 10 written in A while he was proofreading FE (→GE,EE). Traces of this proofreading are clearly visible in both bars. What is interesting is the fact that in bar 2 A had initially another version, in which a
In bar 2 the added note a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Chopin's hesitations , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 12-13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
We consider the lack of hold of g as an error of A, which was not corrected in any of the subsequent sources. Chopin's more relaxed approach at the time of writing the first phrase of the Etude is indicated by other undeniable mistakes – lack of category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors of A |
||||||||
b. 13-14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Lack of the tie sustaining a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The omission of the additional semiquaver on the last note is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE3 (→GE4→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Lack of the dot prolonging G in FE (→GE1) is probably an error. The sign was added in EE, as well as in GE2 and subsequent GE,s. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |