![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
It is not clear at all if by leaving the 2nd half of the bar not entirely completed with rhythmic values in the upper voice, Chopin forgot about the dots extending the b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In FE (→GE,EE) the dashes determining the range of stretto e cresc. were most probably overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 32-33
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The slur of A reaches the end of bar 32, yet in FE it was led until the beginning of bar 33, so that in GE and EE it reaches the 1st chord in this bar (in GE5 to the second, probably by mistake). According to us, it does not correspond to Chopin's intention. Moreover, in the editions the slur in bars 33-34 was omitted – perhaps the engraver of FE did not know, from which note to begin it. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 38-39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The accents in A are undoubtedly long here, which was, however, erroneously reproduced in FE (→GE). In EE the second mark was omitted, certainly by accident. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE |