Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 75-76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The long accents visible in A were interpreted in FE as a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
At the beginning of the bar Fontana completed Chopin's fingering. For the 2nd note he chose the 1st finger, which is a justified suggestion, yet not the only possible one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 76-77
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The poorly visible slur in A was overlooked in FE (→EE2,GE1→GE2→GE3). The sign was added in EE3 (→EE4) and GE4 (→GE5), most probably by analogy with the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In EE Fontana added the fingering for the first two figures, beginning from thirds. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Despite the fact that the correct text is actually undeniable, its correct notation in the sources appears only in GE3 (→GE4→GE5). The notation of A is unclear in terms of division into voices (hands), which may have resulted in a rhythmic error of FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE2→EE3). In turn, at the time of adding minim stems in EE4, the G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Inaccuracies in A |
& accent in 
note was omitted.