|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Lack of wedge in this place is undoubtedly a result of distraction – cf. three subsequent bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Lack of the natural raising c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In the subsequent bars the slurring and articulation of semiquavers were changed by Chopin. Certain details of the intended result of these changes are not clear, while one of the possible interpretations assumes the slur to be shortened. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In the main text we give the articulation (slurs, without staccato sign) in the 1st half of the bar on the basis of FE, which was probably proofread by Chopin. The reason why the earlier start of the slur (from the 1st note) introduced in this edition was reproduced neither in GE nor in EE remains a mystery. An alternative suggestion with a shortened slur in the 2nd half of bar 23 refers to analogous slurs of FE in bars 24-25. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Lack of the wedges over the topmost notes in bar 24 in EE and in bar 25 in GE2-GE5 is certainly a result of the engravers' errors. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
to c in 
