Slurs
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
The ending of the slur from the previous bars, given in the main text, is a result of interpretation of unclear in this respect authentic sources, A and FE. When interpreted literally, the ending of the slur in this place is absent in both sources. category imprint: Interpretations within context |
||||||
b. 18-19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE3) there is no ending of the slur in bar 19 (in the new line). It is a common mistake of the first editions of Chopin's works, particularly French, as well as of the autographs. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
Shortening of the slur in the editions is, according to us, a result of either a misunderstanding of the autograph or the engraver's inaccuracy. Cf. bars 25-31. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 25-31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
All slurs of A clearly reach the 1st quavers in these bars marked staccato (apart from bars 27-28, discussed separately). It is unclear why they were shortened in the editions, yet nothing indicates that it could be a result of Chopin's intervention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
The correct phrasing of the motif in these bars, although not marked by Chopin, is undeniable, therefore, in the main text we suggest a slur based on the adjacent bars. The slur of A is a typical triplet slur and if Chopin had paid attention to this place, he would have probably added a phrasing slur or prolonged the existing one. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Triplet slurs |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »