



Rhythm
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We give the time signature after A. Although FE (→GE,EE) displays category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The rhythmic value of the chord in FE – a minim – is probably erroneous, as in the 2nd half of the bar there is no relevant rest. The error was corrected both in EE (by adding a rest) and GE (by changing the minim to a semibreve). In the main text we give the latter, compliant with the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Chopin changed the rhythm of A while proofreading FE (there are visible traces of this change). The withdrawal from the rhythmic underlining of the topmost note of the passage may be related to a minor change in the Etude's concept, revealed also in increasing its tempo. See also bars 30 and 32. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The sustained d3 note is most probably the original version. Chopin interfered with the text of FE in this bar on a number of occasions (rhythm in the L.H., category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 30-32
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Double dotted rhythm (with a demisemiquaver) at the end of bars 30 and 32 in A was changed by Chopin during a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). The change has an undeniable impact on the expressive character of these motifs, however, it also cannot be excluded that it is related to the acceleration of the Etude's tempo, which was also introduced in a proofreading of FE. Cf. bar 27. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |