Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 54-55
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The right ending of the tie sustaining a2 was arranged slightly too high in FE (→GE1). In GE2 (→GE3→GE4) the tie was given an already totally erroneous form of a phrase mark combining a2 in bar 54 with d3 in bar 55. In the main text we give the only undoubtedly authentic version with sustained a2. We give the same version, written with a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A (→FE→EE3) there is neither the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||
|
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We add cautionary accidentals before the 1st and 5th notes in the L.H. The natural before g was already added in GE2 (→GE3→GE4). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of the slur in FE (→GE1) is certainly a mistake. The slur was added in EE and subsequent GE,s. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
repeated before a2 in bar 55 (earlier notation convention), as a separate variant, due to the not entirely determined sound of the penultimate chord in bar 55.
to B nor the 
in 
