mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 67-79
p. 1, b. 1-11
p. 2, b. 12-26
p. 3, b. 27-37
p. 4, b. 38-51
p. 5, b. 52-66
p. 6, b. 67-79
Main text
Main text
CLI - Copy by Linowski
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - First English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
CLI - Copy by Linowski
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - First English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 74

No mark in CLI & EE

Accent in FE (→GE)

Lack of the accent, undoubtedly authentic, in EE is most probably a result of the engraver's distraction (cf. bars 71-78).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: GE1
Complete ➔