



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In both known copies of EE2, the omitted accents were added by hand. They were also added in the later impressions of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accent sign in FE is clearly different than in bars 1-2. Most probably, according to Chopin's intentions, it was supposed to be a long accent. Both in GE and in EE it was rendered as a casual short accent. In GE4 (→GE5) the sign was omitted, which was probably a mistake. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accents in bars 38 and 40 in FE (→GE1) have a form suggesting the use of long accents by Chopin. In EE2 (→EE3) the signs were omitted. In the remaining editions common short accents were given. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
We give category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |