|
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In EE2 there are no ties sustaining the G1-G octave, which is almost certainly a mistake (cf. bars 30-31). See the previous remark. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI is missing the lower note of the sustained octave. Most probably the copyist forgot to write 8 under both Gs. In EE2 there are no ties sustaining the octave, which is probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The difference in fingering between the first and the second four-note group of semiquavers, the only one in the entire Etude, raises doubts whether one of the digits – 3 over c1 or 4 over c2 – is not a mistake. It was probably what the reviser of EE (Fontana?) thought, taking the decision to change the digit over c1 from 3 to 4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In CLI there is no cautionary category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 27-37
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of FE (→GE,EE). (In GE3 the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
before f1.
sign was mistakenly omitted in bars 29 and 31, while in