data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 77-79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
||||||||||
b. 77-79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
It is hard to definitely determine whether the lack of upper octaves in CLI is a result of the copyist's error or – which seems to be more plausible – the original version. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes |
||||||||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Apart from EE2 (→EE3), in which the fermata mark was undoubtedly overlooked, the notation of the remaining sources has the same meaning, yet in the case of FE, GE3 and EE4 the notation is certainly imprecise. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions |