Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and FE (→EE) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of CLI |
|||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and FEcor there are no accidentals before the fourth in the lower voice, which is certainly a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI |
|||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In one of the last proofreadings of FE the A-a octave was preceded with naturals, which are highly unjustified here. The signs were probably added – by Chopin or perhaps by the reviser who worked with him – together with the necessary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
We add cautionary naturals before the G-g octave. The addition was also made in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) and EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Chopin did not mark the ending of the slur in FE (→EE2→EE3), whose beginning he wrote himself in FEcor (→FE→GE,EE). We add the only possible addition in this situation, in accordance with the ending of the slur introduced in GE (and EE4). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
returning e2 on the 12th semiquaver. This version, with repeated e
2, although acceptable from the musical point of view, is however certainly a mistake, which is proved by the 
