Verbal indications
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we do not consider written in Ap, as in comparison with this manuscript, Chopin significantly reduced the number of dynamic markings in the version prepared for printing. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the dim. indication written by Chopin in FEcor (→FE→EE). In GE1 (→GE2→GE3) an extended, dimin. form was used, and in later GE,s the indication was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The pair of signs in Ap may be considered as an alternative to cresc. - - - in FEcor. In the finished version of FE (→GE,EE) the dashes limiting the range of the dynamic scope were omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 9-13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |