



b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The unequivocal long accent, written by Chopin in FEcor, was erroneously recreated as a diminuendo mark in FE (→GE,EE). Although the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
This is the second of the places in which Chopin changed the melodic line of the Etude (cf. bar 28). The final version is present in Ap, it was also already written in the base text for FE.
In one of the last proofreadings of FE (→EE) a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The semibreve in CLI is undoubtedly the original version. In the final version Chopin enriched the sound and made the rhythm more robust. In Ap category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The slurs combining the E category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |