mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 40

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

No indication in A

in FE (→GE,EE)
..

Chopin added  while proofreading FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 41-42

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

..

In both bars in A (→FE), there are no accidentals before the last note of the 2nd group of semiquavers. These patent oversights were completed in GE and EE. The sharps are also written in pencil in FES.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES , Inaccuracies in A

b. 41

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

in A (→FE→EE)

in GE
..

In GE, same as in the entire Op. 10, the dim. abbreviation was replaced with dimin., which Chopin used much less frequently.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 41

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

No fingering in A

Fingering in FE (→GE)

EE
..

Two fingering digits given in the main text come from FE (→GE,EE). Fontana repeated them in EE also at the beginning of the next group of 4 semiquavers.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 41

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

No mark in A (→FE→GE)

Dot in EE
..

The staccato dot in EE is undoubtedly an editorial addition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions