b. 23
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The grace note in the form of a small crotchet is certainly an error of EE1, corrected in EE2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 23-26
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Placing the marks in bars 23-24 and 25-26 shows consequent discrepancies between GE and FE (→EE). According to the editors, both ways of pedalling are authentic and can be successfully applied in practice, hence we propose to juxtapose them in the variant form. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The mark appears in the sources already at the end of bar 22. However, in similar situations, e.g. in bars 8-9 and 12-13, suitable marks are put a quaver later. Therefore, we consider this possibility – as an alternative one – also here. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of marks in FE (→EE) is probably a result of a less precise marking in [A1]. A comparison with the analogous bars in the entire Prelude indicates a possibility of an inaccurate (incomplete) notation also in GE. Due to this fact, in the main text we propose an addition of the mark in bar 24. We also give an alternative version (one-and-a-half bar mark) based on the dominant manner of marking similar bars in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the notation of GE, more coherent with the notation of the suitable octave in bar 26. category imprint: Differences between sources |