b. 72-73
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of signs in FE (→EE) is probably a result of a less precise marking of [A1]. The comparison with analogous bars in the entire Prelude indicates a possibility of an inaccurate (incomplete) notation also in GE. Due to that fact, in the main text we propose to complete the sign in bar 72. We also give an alternative proposition (one-and-a-half bar sign), based on the prevailing in GE way of marking similar bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||||||
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the notation of GE, which is more coherent with the notation of adequate octaves in bars 70 and 74. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The omitted before the last quaver in FE1 was added in FE2 and EE. The correct text is also in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The mark in this place appears in all sources except the possibly inaccurate FE2. Due to the doubt concerning Chopin's intentions in other similar situations we consider two possible ways of pedalling in the variant form. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Similarly as in the previous situations in analogous bars, we propose to complete the arpeggio here. category imprint: Editorial revisions |