b. 17-18
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The notation of JC reflects the erroneous draft notation of [AI]. Formally, the notation of EF is correct, but lack of hold of the second f may be considered as an oversight in relation to the remaining sources (or perhaps as a revision – cf. bars 44-45). In the main text we give the more precise notation of [A] (→PE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in Fontana's editions |
||||||
b. 17
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, only the highest note of the chord, d2, is prolonged with a dot. Chopin would often use such a notation, therefore, it cannot be excluded that it corresponds to the notation of [AI] and does not have to be a mistake. In the main text we give the unequivocal compatible version of EF and PE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in JC |
||||||
b. 18
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the more precise notation of PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 18
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
We consider the additional slur over first three semiquavers visible in PE, albeit its meaning is unclear. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 18
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The hairpins are featured only in EF. As in analogous bar 10 a respective sign is present also in PE, in the main text we propose a variant solution. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |