b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
According to us, lack of the ornament in PE is probably a consequence of the engraver's error who did not understand the notation of [A] or simply forgot to include a relevant sign. Therefore, in the main text we propose a possibility of considering a mordent (in this context = ). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in PE |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the vertical accent present in the base source, PE. In this context, the sign in EF should rather be interpreted as a long accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Vertical accents |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The indications cresc. or dim. placed inside the or signs is one of characteristic features of Chopin's autographs. The and signs in EF were probably added by Fontana (they are absent in JC), who in this case perfectly guessed the composer's intentions. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we consider the slur of PE underlining legato. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the pedalling of PE, most probably drawn from [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources |