FEF
compare
b. 86
In the main text we give the notation of PE, as from the formal point of view it is error-free and may correspond to the notation of [A]. The notation of JC and EF, however, seems to be more logical:
- from the practical point of view – the e note cannot be held with fingers as a crotchet, as it was written in PE, due to the fact that it is struck again on the 2nd quaver;
- due to the voice-lead – in the notation of PE, the progression of the lower voice of the R.H., absolutely regular from the beginning of that phrase in bar 82, is clearly disrupted on the 1st quaver in bar 86.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
notation: Rhythm