



b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The c note in JC is most probably the copyist's error, which is revealed by d which is present both in EF and PE. In the two remaining similar phrases (bars 62-63 and 74-75), the chord on which the second bar is based differs significantly from the chord in the first bar; adopting the c note as the bass note would reduce the difference mainly to the omission of e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the highest note of the chord could be considered as the so-called Terzverschreibung if it was not for the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 72
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The fingering of EF was probably added by Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 72-76
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 72
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the accent which is present only in PE. Our attention is drawn by a difference in relation to analogous bar 76, in which the relevant sign falls on the 2nd beat of the bar. In the case of the accent of EF, one could have doubts as to which voice it should apply – a distinctive highlighting of one of the thirds of the accompaniment seems to be totally unjustified here. category imprint: Differences between sources |