data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 70
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
One can ponder the practical meaning of the indication legato in PE in relation to the slur which already determines this articulation, yet it does not question its authenticity. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
JC has additional flats before e category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Last key signature sign |
||||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly correct slurs of PE. In JC there are no slurs here, whereas the divided slurs of EF is probably an inaccuracy related to the end of the octave sign. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In EF first three groups of demisemiquavers are written with an octave sign. In JC the notes are written in the same way, yet the octave sign was omitted, which is a patent error. In this graphic layout the f category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
We give the wedge which appears only in PE. In JC, there is no articulation marking, whereas in EF first two quavers in the L.H. are linked with a slur. Cf. bar 75. category imprint: Differences between sources |