Issues : Errors of GC
b. 446
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Before the upper note of the second octave in GC there is no natural lowering G to G. This obvious omission was supplemented in GE. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the copyist omitted treble clef in this bar. This obvious mistake was corrected - penciled in - by the engraver or editor of GE. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC and FE1 there is no lowering g2 to g2. This obvious mistake was corrected in GE and FE2. The accidental present in EE seems to be an editorial revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 506-508
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The version with g3 (in b. 506) and g2 (in b. 508) would be possible but for a broader harmonic context, and especially the E minor key in force here since b. 495. Therefore, there is no doubt that Chopin omitted naturals and the version of GE is correct. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 518-520
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The hairpins in GC (→GE) may have been overlooked, but it cannot be ruled out that it is an authentic dynamic avriant. Therefore, we propose a variant soulution - bracketed hairpins. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |