mUltimate Chopin

Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 429

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

a1 in EE and GC (→GE)

a1 in FE
..

No  in FE augmenting a1 to a1 may be an omission, similarly in b. 87.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 431

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Short accent in EE & GC (→GE)

No mark in FE

Our suggestion—a long accent
..

Similarly to the corresponding b. 89, we believe a long accent to be musically justified and, taking into account possible inaccuracies in reading the autograph, possibly accepted as a source.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 431

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Minim b2 in EE & GC (→GE)

Crotchet in FE
..

The one-voice notation in FE must be an error here, even if it can be found in [A2], which is proven by the notation of other sources as well as an identical version of the corresponding b. 89 in all the sources.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 431-432

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

No tie in EE
 
..

No tie on c1 in EE must be an error - in the corresponding bars 89-90 there is a tie also in this edition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 431

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In EE there is cautionary  before a1. This may have been an editorial revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions