Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC and FE1 there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||
|
b. 509-510
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
There are no grounds to question the authenticity of pedal releasing marks in FE (in b. 509), or in GC (→GE) in b. 510. However, the EE pedalling - a separate pedal mark per one chord in b. 510 - seems substantively very doubtful, as in most cases Chopin marked the necessity of adding the sound of notes played in different time. We believe the basis for EE may have had two category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 519-528
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE all the chords notes are tied in bars 519-521 and 527-529, however in b. 521 there is no f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 529
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Only in GE the slur beginning in b. 526 extends over until here. In GC and EE the slurs end in b. 528, in FE there is no sign at all. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 529
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE all 8 notes of the chord are tied over the bar line of the previous bar. This must be erroneous revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
lowering g
2 to g2. This obvious mistake was corrected in 
marks by mistake and the engraver or editor while trying to make sense out of this notation, added 
. In the main text we present our variant proposal that includes two undoubtedly authentic versions of pedalling.
