Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
As we adopt the rhythm of FE for our main text, we give the beginning of the sign after that source as well. GC (→GE) have the same version. However, in our opinion it is the hairpin in EE that conveys better what Chopin probably intended (cf. bars 113 and 129). Similarly in bars 389-390. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
EE has a short accent here. As the remaining sources clearly have long accents, the notation of the English edition must probably be inaccurate. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We put a long accent into our main text, following FE. In the remaining sources this mark may be interpreted either as a long accent or as a hairpin mark . In practice, the difference is negligible, as in Chopin's notation marks that are not preceded by have the meaning of a long accent and diminuendo. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC (→GE) do not have staccato dots in the L.H. in this bar, probably due to the copyist's accidental omission. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 72-73
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In our main text we give the dynamic markings ( and a long accent) as we see them in GC (→GE). EE has none of those marks, and FE only has in bar 72. Those are either earlier versions, or results of oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |