Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The accent in this bar can be found in EE - a short one - and in GC (→GE) – a long one. Actually, when considering the notation of just that single page in GC, one could have doubts as to the length of that accent - our interpretation is based on comparisons with analogous bars. The absence of the accent from FE is probably an error (cf. bar 33). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 117-118
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A missing tie sustaining G sharp in EE and FE is probably an oversight - cf. analogous bars 35-36 and 377-378. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Missing in GC and FE are the naturals cancelling the sharping of e to e sharp before the last crotchet of the bar, which is an obvious error. EE and GE have the correct version, consistent with the analogous bars 40 and 382. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 131-132
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Absence of a tie sustaining f sharp in FE is most probably an error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 134
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The minim d sharp1 that can be seen in FE1 is definitely erroneous, as we can conclude from the presence of e1 appearing consistently in all the remaining sources and the version of the analogous bar 142. The error was corrected in FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
in 
