Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Verbal indications

b. 18

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE

No marking in GC (→GE) & FE

..

The version without  in GC (→GE) is probably the initial version of the markings in bars 1-20. As for FE, the engraver's oversight is also possible.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 21

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 and risoluto in EE

GC (→GE)

 alone in FE

..

FE does not have the risoluto indication, which is either the initial version or the engraver's oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 34-35

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

GC has  at the end of bar 34, while FE has it at the beginning of that bar. In EE  is on the bar line, which probably reflects Chopin's notation in [A1]; GE has the same placement. However, it is obvious that the practical possibility of execution of that dynamic indication only appears in bar 35, with the struck note g.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 67-90

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

Breaking the word crescendo into syllables in EE is one of the revisions typical for Wessel's publications.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: EE revisions

b. 136

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE & GC (→GE)

No marking in FE

..

It is not easy to find out whether the absence of  in FE is simply an error of that edition or the result of inaccurate notation of the manuscript that served as its base text. In any case, it seems unlikely that Chopin could decide not to have that marking here.

category imprint: Differences between sources