Verbal indications
|
b. 348
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Lack of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 352-366
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE a cresc. marking written out by a whole word and split into syllables. This is an example of a characteristic manner of this edition. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 359-366
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present - thanks to the range of a dashed line - a more accurate application of the marking from GC. In GE the dashed line was omitted and the abbreviated marking accel. was written out as acceler. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 367
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A tempo primo marking visible in GC was not put down by Chopin, however there is no doubt about its authenticity. In GE it was replaced with a conventional marking used in such situations and in the main text we adopt a similar solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 375
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the ten. marking in FE may result from misinterpretation of the beginning of an abbreviated notation in [A2] (it is most probable that Chopin used the same abbreviation as in [A1]). In a corresponding b. 33 the marking is found FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
in 
