Issues : Long accents
|
b. 119
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The accent type that Chopin had in mind here is unclear. Judging from its size, the accent mark in A resembles a short accent; still, most short accents on that page of A are even smaller (e.g. in bars 116, 118, 120, 124). On the other hand, the shape is typical for long accents. GE (→FE→EE) all have short accents. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |
|||||||
|
b. 121
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||
|
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The type of accent intended by Chopin is not clear. A long accent seems more probable when we compare that bar to the analogous bar 117. GE (→FE→EE) have a short accent here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||
|
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The accent type that Chopin used in this bar is not obvious. There are more arguments, both graphic and musical, for the long accent option. GE (→FE→EE) all have short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||
|
b. 128
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The type of accent used by Chopin in A is not quite obvious, yet both its shape and the comparison with analogous bars (120 and 122) clearly point to a long accent. In GE1 (→FE→EE) the accent was omitted and in GE2 (→GE3) a short one was added. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
