|
b. 117-118
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the most probable reading of the slur in A. In GE (→FE→EE) the slur was stretched to embrace full beats. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 118
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In GE2 (→GE3) the slur embracing the two quavers was removed. That revision could seem in place when the slur from bar 117 reached the second one of the two quavers. However, in our main text we retain Chopin's slurring from A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 119
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The accent type that Chopin had in mind here is unclear. Judging from its size, the accent mark in A resembles a short accent; still, most short accents on that page of A are even smaller (e.g. in bars 116, 118, 120, 124). On the other hand, the shape is typical for long accents. GE (→FE→EE) all have short accents. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 120-122
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In EE, no account was taken of the difference between the accents from bars 120 and 122 visible in A (→GE→FE). The accent in bar 122 in GE1 differs very slightly from the neighbouring short accents, yet this small difference was enough to have its type correctly recognized in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 120-146
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In GE2 (→GE3), conventional slurs were arbitrarily added connecting grace notes to their main notes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
