|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The extent of the slur of A is somewhat unclear from the graphic point of view; we adopt the interpretation that is more natural in the context and consistent with the slurring in the two preceding bars. In GE (→FE→EE) the whole motif in that bar was slurred. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
It is not entirely clear whether Chopin intended the accent in A to apply to the right hand, as was understood in GE1 (→FE→EE), or to both hands, which we consider more likely. Allocation of the accent to the left hand, as in GE2 (→GE3), is in our opinion a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
It can be noticed in A that Chopin changed the notation of dotted quavers from a1 to b double flat1. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Enharmonic corrections |
||||||||
|
b. 96-98
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In GE1 (→FE→EE) the dashes marking the extent of the dynamic change were omitted. In GE2 (→GE3) the dashes were put back, yet Chopin's abbreviation dim. was changed to dimin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 97-99
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In EE the agogic indications in those bars were placed between the staves. Chopin's abbreviation accel. was replaced with the full word in GE (→FE→EE). In GE1, GE2 and FE that full-word term was misspelt (double 'l'). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
