Issues : Errors in GE
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The extent of the hairpins was reproduced particularly carelessly in GE1 (→FE) - which is probably the engraver's fault. Attempts to correct the hairpins position were made both in EE and in GE2 (→GE3). In the main text we reproduce the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The wedge above the crotchet b1, present in A, was omitted from GE1 (→FE→EE). The staccato sign was restored in GE2 (→GE3) in the form of a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In GE1 (→FE→EE) the sixth e1-c2 has a staccato dot. This is most probably a mistake - the dot was to refer to the 1st crotchet of that bar. The sign was removed in GE2 (→GE3). Cf. the note to bar 53. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The omission of the accent from GE1 (→FE→EE) was probably accidental. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The first quaver f is written slightly too high in A, so in GE1 it was read as g flat. The mistake was corrected in FE (→EE), as well as in GE2 (→GE3) category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccurate note pitch in A |