Issues : Wedges
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The staccato mark from A was rendered in GE (→FE>EE) as a dot. In the editors' opinion, interpreting that mark as a wedge is much more justified, the arguments being its shape (despite its small size it is a line clearly standing out from among the surrounding dots) and the presence of unmistakable wedges in the analogous bars 12, 44, 90, 94 and 96. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
What is clearly a wedge in A has been reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as a dot. The entire Opus 24 has only dots as staccato signs in the first editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
An evident wedge in A was reproduced in GE (→FE) as a dot (in GE, wedges were not used even once throughout the Mazurkas Op. 24). In EE, the sign was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
All the sources have staccato marked here with a dot. As in A Chopin used wedges in all the three neighbouring similar phrases, we consider this single dot to be an inaccuracy of notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The wedge that can be seen in A above the crotchet on the 2nd beat of the bar was omitted from GE1 (→FE→EE). The correction was made in GE2 (→GE3), i.e. a dot was added. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
