Issues : EE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 84-85
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In A (→GE→FE), the slur at the end of bar 84 does not match the slur in bar 85 that opens a new system. The slur in bar 85 is drawn as a new one, not a continuation. This inaccurate notation may be interpreted in two ways:
In EE1 (→EE2) the slurring discrepancy was resolved by omitting the slur at the end of bar 84. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The evident staccato sign in A, which in our opinion should be read as a wedge, was omitted from GE1 (→FE→EE1→EE2). A dot was added in GE2 (→GE3) to rectify that error. EE3 has an accent added instead, probably by analogy to bars 15 and 19. We base our main text on A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||
b. 100-104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The slur added in EE3, probably modelled on the one added in EE in bars 16-17, is definitely inauthentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 103-104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The slur added in EE3 was modelled on authentic slurs from bars 15-16 and analogous bars. However, we do not include that slur, as Chopin actually marked the last appearance of the main theme of the Mazurka by that slight difference. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 109-112
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
Taken literally, A has got two slurs in the L.H. embracing bars 109-110 and 111-112. In spite of that, in GE (→FE) the entire four-bar section is embraced by a single slur This seems to be a fortunate inaccuracy, as there are no grounds for applying different slurring than the one used in analogous bars 105-108 (and only in the L.H. probably - see the note concerning the R.H.). EE has got two slurs, which may have been influenced by the R.H. slurring. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »