Issues : GE revisions
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The extent of the hairpins was reproduced particularly carelessly in GE1 (→FE) - which is probably the engraver's fault. Attempts to correct the hairpins position were made both in EE and in GE2 (→GE3). In the main text we reproduce the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In GE2 (→GE3) the slur was lengthened, probably by analogy with bar 35. In our main text we retain the notation of A (→GE1→FE→EE), as in this context both notations are practically equivalent in meaning. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
There are no staccato signs above the crotchet on the 2nd beat in bars 38 and 40 in A (→GE1→FE→EE). In GE2 (→GE3) dots were added in those places. As the lack of the signs most probably results from inaccurate notation of A, we suggest adding wedges, following the example of most analogous bars. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 38-44
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In GE2 (→GE3), tiny slurs were added linking grace notes in bars 38, 40, 42 and 44 with the following crotchets. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In A (→GE1→GE2, FE→EE), there are no staccato signs above the crotchet on the 2nd beat of the bar. In GE3 a dot was added. As the lack of the sign most probably results from inaccurate notation of A, in our main text we add a wedge, following the example of most analogous bars. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |