



b. 279-280
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 281
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A (→GE→EE1,IE) the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , FE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE , Errors repeated in IE |
|||||
b. 281-282
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
It is difficult to imagine that the literal interpretation of the A slur, which does not include 3 (or 2) outermost quavers belonging to the chromatic scale, could have corresponded to Chopin's intention. Therefore, we consider it one of the many inaccuracies of A in this respect; in the main text we include the interpretation of this slur adopted to GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 281
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
It is difficult to determine whether the addition of the fingering digit in EE influenced the omission of the wedge, or whether the wedge was mistakenly read as the digit 1, meaning finger 2. It is also possible that the wedge was overlooked and the digit was added independently, along with the other digits in the previous two bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 282-283
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The omission of the slurs/ties between the chords is an oversight by the engraver of GE (→FE,EE,IE). It cannot be ruled out that the engraver did not insert the slurs due to doubts regarding their significance and position with respect to the arpeggio wavy line. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |