data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The missing mark in FE and EE is probably an oversight by the engravers; in the case of EE it is already a second oversight of this kind (see bars 266-268). Judging from the version of the aforementioned bars, the A mark could have been written inaccurately (too early); however, in the main text we keep the source notation.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, Errors in EE, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Pedalling