data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In GE the ending of the slur in bar 99 (at the end of a line) can be considered a tenuto slur. However, it is most probably an inaccuracy – the slur was either supposed to reach bar 100, as it is in A, or the f crotchet, as it was unanimously interpreted in the remaining editions.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, EE inaccuracies, Tenuto slurs,
notation: Slurs