b. 293
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The earlier starting point of the slur in GE (→FE,IE) is either a routine revision, adjusting a slur to a rhythmic group (in this case a bar), or an inaccuracy. The EE version could have resulted from a misinterpretation of the GE slur, and its compliance with the A notation is almost certainly accidental. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 294
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A the third in the bottom voice is a semibreve, which is a mistake. It was corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE). Four bars later, all sources contain the correct version. Similarly, in bar 306. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
|||||
b. 294-295
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A the sempre legato indication is written at the beginning of a new page, in bar 295. However, the way it was written may suggest that Chopin also wanted it to concern the preceding bar, which seems logical, since this is the first bar in which the figuration is devoid of a slur (cf., e.g. bar 164). Due to the above, in the main text we put it in bar 294. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 294
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
We interpret the mark entered into A as a long accent – cf. bars 108-109. The editions generally present its literal interpretation – only the beginning thereof was slightly moved. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 294-298
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The version of the last crotchet in bar 294 and 298 was introduced into EE2 probably by analogy with bar 306 and 310, in which a respective note (a) was omitted already in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |