![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
b. 24-26
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
The authentic notation, carefully defining the crescendo's range, was simplified to a standard abbreviation in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 24-26
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we omit the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE in bars 24 and 26. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
In the 2nd half of the bar A contains two L.H. slurs, from the 5th to the 10th quaver and from the 7th to the 10th quaver. The first one is deleted by the extension to the slur from the 1st part of the bar, which means that Chopin initially divided the quavers as follows: 4+6 (as in the previous bar), and then changed the division to 6+4, in accordance with the rhythm of the harmonic changes. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
In the sources the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 26-27
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
In this case, it seems that there are no reasons to doubt the accuracy of the A slur, which encompasses the three-quaver chromatic linking motif between the phrase that just finished and the surprising G category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |