



b. 32
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
In A, between the 3rd and the 4th chord, there are 3 slurs of the same shape, suggesting an ascending second motif. The middle one is written at the pitch of f1, hence, when interpreted literally, it does not concern any of the notes. It can be considered an inaccuracy; therefore, the slur could be assigned to a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||
b. 32-33
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we omit the inauthentic fingering added in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 33
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
In EE1 the quaver beams for the pairs of middle semiquavers on the 2nd and 3rd beat are missing, which makes them dotted or regular crotchets. This is a patent mistake, corrected in EE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 33
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
The FE and IE version resulted from a misunderstanding of the Chopinesque notation of harmonic legato, in which the moments the particular notes should be played are determined by the regular semiquaver pattern, while the rhythmic values in the additional "voices" are only meant to show how long the particular notes are to be held, creating transitory chords; the values are not to be considered linearly. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , |
|||||
b. 33-34
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the L.H. slurs in the second part of bar 33 and in bar 34 could be due to graphic reasons – Chopin probably stopped writing the slur in A in bar 33 after realising that it would be impossible to lead it to the end of the bar due to the category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |