data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE2
compare
In the main text we do not include any of the two versions of the inauthentic fingering provided in EE1 and EE2. The EE1 version could have resulted from a mistake, since the fingering of similar motifs with a repeated note points to the reviser's clear preference for swapping fingers in such situations.
See also bars 187-192, 195-199 and 201-204.
Compare the passage in the sources »
See b. 2-7
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions
notation: Fingering