data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
A
compare
In the main text we do not include any of the two versions of the inauthentic fingering provided in EE1 and EE2. The EE1 version could have resulted from a mistake, since the fingering of similar motifs with a repeated note points to the reviser's clear preference for swapping fingers in such situations.
See also bars 187-192, 195-199 and 201-204.
Compare the passage in the sources »
See b. 2-7
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions
notation: Fingering