|
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A and FE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The FE rhythm (→EE) must be a mistake, probably committed by the copyist in [FC]. Moving the semiquaver beyond the 3rd quaver in the L.H. triplet was an arbitrary decision by the engraver of GE – see bars 77-82 and 245-249. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Dotted rhythms and triplets , Dotted or even rhythm |
||||||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we give the A version (→GE), analogous to the version in bar 168. The FE version could be considered a Terzverschreibung mistake if it were not for the fact that it is musically reasonable and could have been introduced by Chopin into [FC] or while proofreading FE1. Such swinging motion of the figuration topmost notes can often be seen in Chopin's pieces, cf., e.g. the Variations in B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to a category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 244-245
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The slurs were most probably added to A after [FC] had been finished – hence their absence in FE (→EE1). In EE2 the slurs were added on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources |
to the 4th L.H. quaver. The patent oversight was corrected in 
, Op. 12, bars 192-195, Bolero, Op. 19, bars 155-167, Sonata in B minor, Op. 58, I mov., bars 41-47. Therefore, this version can be considered an equal variant.
