Pitch
|
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The chord in the 2nd half of the bar initially contained b category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||
|
b. 290-293
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The seven accents written in A, in spite of slight differences in length, are certainly long accents. All editions reproduced them as common, short accents, probably due to the fact that in this context they could not be considered diminuendos, which is how Chopinesque long accents were generally interpreted. The absence of the penultimate mark (at the beginning of bar 293) is most probably an oversight by the copyist or by the engraver of FE1. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 the accidental to the bottom note of the 1st R.H. chord is missing. The sharp was added by FE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to d category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 292
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to e category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
(2) instead of a(2), which can be seen under the deletion visible in 
