Pitch
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 the bottom to the 1st chord in the R.H. triplet is at the pitch of a1; moreover, there is no to the top note of the 2nd chord in the triplet. Both mistakes were corrected in FE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|
b. 282
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the 2nd half of the bar the top note of the 2nd L.H. quaver is a b in FE1. The mistake was corrected in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A one can see a deletion before the 1st L.H. crotchet, yet it allows us to decipher the removed element, that is a C1-E tenth. Therefore, this is a self-correction of a frequent mistake in Chopin's autographs consisting in adding too many ledger lines (cf., e.g. the Polonaise in C minor, Op. 26 No. 1, bar 5 or the Nocturne in D, Op. 27 No. 2, bar 44). category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Terzverschreibung error , Errors in the number of ledger lines , Deletions in A |
|
b. 286
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE there are no accidentals to the minim L.H. chord. The mistake was corrected in EE by adding a necessary raising e1 to e1 as well as a to e (superfluous, in A it was deleted). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|
b. 288-289
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In bar 288, in the minim L.H. chord, Chopin repeated a to e1, perhaps confused by the difference in levels between this note and the e1 note in the 1st chord in the bar. The superfluous accidental was omitted in FE (→EE). Similarly, in bar 289 all sources feature a to a in the 1st quaver chord. In the same chord, however, the necessary raising e to e is missing. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |